The Much Degradous Transformation of The Overly Esoteric Poet (Prose/Quasi Essay)

Poem by Martin Anton Smith martinantonsmith@gmail.com

Poets should be openly willing to explain their overly esoteric poetry.

Overly Esoteric poetry without an explanation is I believe, simply an act of anal retention, or of admission of guilt to the very serious charge of ‘literary onanism’.

Overly Esoteric Poetry is the willing literary creation of a ‘false god’ – The god of ‘stolen mystique’.

The Teleology or Grand Aim of the OEP’ers is to garner ‘false praise’ and ‘unwarranted adulation’.

Some say OEP is a mental illness, but I beg to differ – I believe it to be a ‘serious character flaw’ only.

Many kind people have indeed become victims of the OEP’ers & this must be combatted ‘head on’.

Upon reading Overly Esoteric Poetry & its non-existent explanations, the reader should do one or all of the following:

Rip out & ‘bonfire’ the page immediately (with matches or a lighter), making sure any un-esoteric poems are retained (For best dramatic effect do this to your offending unbought book-store book while in front of a captive audience).

You can stamp on the Guilty Poet’s feet – Stamp twice if they added this comment: “but what does it mean to you – that’s what really counts”

You can write in the margins of the offending passage: “This is far too esoteric, to not have any explanation” (be sure to leave an unhappy face emoji)

You can either write-to or say-to the Poet an equally esoteric verse, explaining or in reality non-explaining, why you did one or all of the above treatments. e.g.

Dear Un – Sir

Your perfidy-ness was dialectically imprecise. On top of this your topiary inelegance was sparce of any gnosis or incandescence. I can only hope that a kaleidoscopic entree of inexactitude will befall your double entendre of an ontologically reverse pathology, resulting in ‘babyloniously’ duplicitous & mixological results. As such I have had to punish you & don’t come crying to me now that it has rightly happened.”

I re-iterate, ‘Overly Esoteric Poetry’ -OEP must be regaled against in all its forms!

Poetry must be an egalitarian pursuit, where the idea is King – for ideas like all fair-minded Kings must exist in plain sight, for a King who is good to his subjects will not fear scrutiny.

The King should be clearly identifiable – be he fully naked, half clothed or pompously garbed.

There need not be any need to guess what the ‘King” is wearing in flip coin fashion, desperately hoping your audience neighbour agrees with your blind guess – that the King’s is ‘naked’ or ‘dressed’ or half-half.

Judicial Sentences for Poets who are creating careers from ‘false god sentences’, must be harsh & nearly immutable.

We must create a new penal colony island. As no untaken islands currently exist – It can be made in a fashion similar to how the Chinese create islands in the South China Seas, by hoovering up sand & redepositing it until it finally rises as a whale emerges from the ocean to draw breath.

Once The OEP Penal Island is constructed, we can build an adulation hermetically sealed dome, where each OEP can face only those of his OEP brethren – and here they will face the reality that they can no longer fool anyone at all – for a crook knows a crook.

Each OEP will swiftly go mad, as they will be deprived of their life-blood – faux adulation.

This is fair – for what they do is a crime against humanity – and this, oh listener is large understatement.

Once they achieve madness – they can be released, for a madman’s deception is obvious and see-able to the sane.

We can then simply re-christen them each as ‘A 21st Century MAN’.

i.e. Somewhat Mad But Does Not Know It.

Thus, proving the adage “a hardened criminal cannot truly be rehabilitated.”

Woe is the Overly Esoteric Poet, So Hated We Even Made Him Into A Typical 21st Century Man.

One Day We Onlooking & Interfering Overlords Of Justice Will Face Our Own Jailors.

And we surely will face the gallows, for the punishment we dished out, did not befit the crime.

We should have simply stopped at ‘shot over the bow tactics’ of the stamping on their feet or the esoterically veracious retort previously quoted.

We went too far with the Penal Island & the hermetically sealed, adulation-free dome.

We Poets & Poetry Critics – most of which are just ‘tryhards‘ – must know where the line is, and always remember:

A ’21st Century Man’ is infinitely worse than an ‘Overly Esoteric Poet’ will ever be.

So perhaps we should just let them OEP’s be.

And I say this not for a deep inbuilt need for social justice,

But for the very real concern – which of course, may really just be garden variety paranoia,

That I might actually be one of them.

But luckily this lack of confidence soon passes,

As I tell myself the very true fact, that I almost always offer explanations for any bouts of OEP.

Where I have failed in this honorable task, I am always willing to divulge my philosophy to anyone suffering my foolishness.

I vow to never just say to a confused reader or listener “But what does it mean to you – that’s all that really counts”.

To not do so would make me a flake & a hypocrite, which I would hate to be, and there certainly is no need to swell the ranks of the OEP.

Postscript: I Being born in 1978, regard myself essentially as a Late 20th Century Man, as I ‘came of age’ around the years surrounding the Millennium’s turn. I will continue to be fond for this 90’s era, as the 1990’s were a rare golden era in the West – an era we did not recognize as a good one until this dastardly 21st Century bed itself in, so allowing recent History to finally crystalize & be seen for what it was. There is of course one way the first quarter of the 21st Century could be one day also be seen as “a good one” – due to historical relativity – but what this implies is a terrible thought indeed, and I suppose involves a gigantic war, that perhaps we are already in. Now excuse me I must get some rest for my poor frazzled now ‘early middle aged’ brain, & I don’t want to end up like Nietzsche – railroaded by acute burn out in his mid forties.

The Spiritual Foothills, Nestled in the Near Future (Prose).

by Martin Anton Smith martinantonsmith@gmail.com

Proposition: I quit my job to change my life & then I became poorer financially, & experienced hardship due to this fact.

But I became happier & more content in my personal life. Did I make a mistake? Or did I make a wise decision?

The materialist onlooker says I made a BIG mistake.

The spiritual viewer – though not mercenarily or necessarily a religious one – says I got it right BIGTIME.

So, who is right? Are both the spiritual viewer and materialist onlooker, right?

Let me expand on the idea more loquaciously in more detail, and perhaps an answer can emerge.

If I get if rich in “Life Choice A” the materialist says ‘I’m right’, and adds with a mixture of excitement & hopefulness “will you come to dinner, with my wife in the foothills”.

If I then become Poor in “Life Choice B” the materialist says “Do I know you?” and certainly doesn’t say “will you come to dinner, with my wife in the foothills”

If I then grow to become rich in “Life choice B” the materialist forgets his poor memory of prior & says I was a genius all along, and he “always knew I’d get rich”. He then adds with a mixture of excitement & hopefulness “will you come to dinner, with my wife in the foothills”

The spiritualist of course invites me to his shack on the flat with the reverse financial polarity of the foothills man.

But in doing so – isn’t he also just as much as a “snob” as the man in the foothills? For if the spiritualist is genuinely a “higher consciousness” than that of foothills man, he should also invite the rich to his shack on the flat. For at worse he can understand the foolish materialist better? Would he also not jump at the chance to enlighten the foothills man?

And could I also not say the same of the ‘foothills man’? If he was a true “prophet of materialism” should he not also invite the poor spiritualist for the same opportunity to save him?

This rarely seems to happen – if it did, we’d live in a much better place for the compromise that would inevitably occur.

I call such diplomatic meetings “Summits for Polar Opposites”.

They are full of untapped positive potential, but also, I must admit if tempers and alcohol flair – could end with fisticuffs.

if all goes well:

By dinners end the unspiritual materialist would have his rough diamonds polished into lenses that allow him to see more of life’s non-financial value. He will admit that it is as ‘real’ as his very real Rolex.

By dinners end the spiritualist would have his old dirty glasses polished into diamonds that allow him to pay his rent more easily. He will admit that it is as ‘real’ as his very real copy of Das Capital.

If All goes badly however and fisticuffs fly – the foothills man has the upper hand regardless of location. If he is at the foothills dwelling his private security will beat the spiritualist guest up, and the police will summarily and swiftly arrive to beat him a second time & then remove him & throw him in jail. The next day they will undoubtably successfully charge him with battery.

If the foothills man is a guest at the spiritualist’s shack on the flat and things go badly, the fight will not be of much consequence – for neither are good fighters. But the foothills man will see the potential in the real estate value of the shack on the flat still & charges of battery & then a civil charge so to acquire the land. It being a fact taht we live in a rich-mans-world – the Spiritualist will lose surely his shack in the court settlement.

Thus, in this analysis what should each party do? What is their dominant strategy given they do not know whether the ‘Summits for Polar Opposites’ will result in ‘Smile filled Philosophical Compromise’ or ‘frenzied fisticuffs?’.

The Foothills man should only agree to go to the Summit if he is a guest at the Spiritual man’s Shack on the flat; The Poor Spiritualist should never agree to meeting the “foothills man” for in either case he could end up in Jail & with a conviction, and in one case will lose his shack on the flat and thus risk be thrown into homelessness.

There is of course a third option, which can rescue the situation entirely:

Both parties the ‘foothills man’ & the ‘spiritualist’ can hold the ‘Summit for Polar Opposites’ remotely via telephone, email, instant messaging or teleconference – thereby erasing the destructive potential of the alternate timeline option of the physically held Summit, with its risks of amplified polar opposite positions, fisticuffs & associated black eyes & torn clothing & one-sided battery convictions, Seized property i.e. Shacks on the flat with its side order of homelessness.

Which now brings us to current History.

But facts are facts: We do not see much compromise and mature diplomacy between the different socio-economic classes – who in cyberspace are called “Left Vs Right” or “Liberal vs Conservative”.

But this poor outcome of what has been 15 years & counting of cyberspace hosted ‘Summits for Polar Opposites’, is simply pigheadedness in equal measures by the Spiritualists & the Folk of the Foothills.

When both parties choose to remove the matching dirty uniforms that is pigheaded tribality, a splendid new garment will be seen. It will be made by those wise men from the future, all living together in harmony in the Spiritual Foothills.

“Soldier Shares in WW3″ (A Poem)

By Martin Anton Smith Feb 12 2022

At Forty-Three, I Got The Nod,

From Couch Blob to World War Three.

Now I’m Half Starving And almost Dead!

But I Haven’t Even Left Yet!

Now There’s a Constant Ringing In My Head.

Coz That Bullet Came From ‘Direction Z’.

But Don’t Despair, My Fellow Bean,

If The War Continues ’til After Tea,

My Share’s Go up 2000 per cent!

Lo and Behold! I’ll Upgrade From The Trench,

To A Raincoat – And Then,

To a Glamorous, High Ceiling Tent!

But If The Enemy Surrenders,

This Great War Will End,

And My Share’s Will Tank!

I’ll Be Skint, Flat Broke – Outa Bread!

But Never-mind Dear Chap,

I Messaged The Other Side,

And Asked Them Politely,

To Keep Up the Fighting.

So Not To Sell Us Short!

For In The Madness of 21st Century War,

Having No Money or Stocks,

Is Universally Agreed Upon As

a Fate Far Worse Than Death.

P.s. The Glorious Soldier Outlasted The War,

And Basks In the Sun Outside His Mansion,

In the Cayman Islands.

And Now Writes His Glorius Memoirs,

Of Trading Stocks,

Amid Whizzing Bullets,

Going Past His Ears,

In the Trenches,

On A “Smartphone”

At “The Front”.