“She Was She, I Was Me, And We Both Still Are” (A Prose Poem + Bonus Material)

by Anton Martin Smith antonmartinsmithwrites@gmail.com or martinantonsmith@gmail.com

Her name was Rose W. Thorn

(Not her real name at all)

She was as they say a ‘small town girl’.

Who like all the kids in high school from the late eighties and nineties and beyond.

Was told by the clueless teachers you had to ‘go to university’ (or yer nuthin’?).

So she ditched the small town and studied something in the nearest city with a uni.

(In fact I did that too, didn’t we all? we were such lemmings!).

Of course moreover all the young want to leave their small towns – we all know it.

(And I’m not saying that’s bad per se).

She graduated with a quasi-profession credential and got an office job….

(She wanted to be an architect but didn’t have the grades – I can sympathize I wanted to be a physicist! What a pity that I couldn’t get out bed to see dear Einstein’s Equations)

Ironically she got an office job in a small town – one not so unlike her hometown.

(But aren’t small towns all roughly the same anyway?)

She had to return to this state of affairs – there were no big city jobs for her – for there was a recession in the early nineties.

It was the only office job she could get in her ‘line of Uni’,

(Beggers can’t be choosers just starting out).

So she stayed and started her career off – a good temp outcome it seemed.

She grinded…she grinded…and it was so long ago now that she may have even used a typewriter (?)

A couple years passed.

Her early ‘apprenticeship’ was duly achieved.

But she was still very young and anxious not to waste her youth (the young run on instinct).

Her feet were getting decidedly ‘itchy’ – as young peoples feet do when stuck in a boring place.

She was shy, but at heart adventurous – especially when blind drunk.

(We all drunk a lot back then, and we who lack confidence need it as social medicine. Entire Nations are like this).

But to go backwards a little.

At this first career-job she met a guy,

Who of course fell in love with her.

(Some people are of course all too easy to fall in love with – she was like that).

He wanted to settle down young marry, have kids and front lawn and a Labrador.

But she wanted to travel the world and party, see the sights, have total freedom.

(And Ultra-independence was like gold to her).

So she said goodbye to him and the future labrador and hello to a plane, a flying tin can.

She soon travelled around the world.

To England, most of Europe, and even to Africa and some other unnamed wild places too.

While on the road she stayed in many a dingy backpackers.

(As you do and are happy to do with at that age – in fact I did it for a long time).

For her home base she stayed in the typical antipodean way – ‘ten person flats’ with only two or three rooms.

After the first bout of travel she pulled beers in England and mixed a few temp office gigs too.

She partied hard – this goes without saying:

(On that looking back – were not the nineties simply an extension of the sixties and seventies?)

She was a westerner in the late 20th century and young.

The parties and dopamine and hormone based experiences rolled on.

(Don’t make me spell them out either, I couldn’t tell you details as I wasn’t with her).

When she was finally Thirty she had to give up that five years of fun and duly went home –

(So back in the tin can it was).

The ‘flat land of red dirt’ some thirty flight-hours away was calling.

She returned to a big dirty city for the rest of her career and is still there some twenty five years later.

(I dare say she will probably stay for the rest of her life).

She could never settle down – and she didn’t really want to.

She was used to and programmed for short relationships and fun times with the men with rizz aplenty.

The ‘trap of excitement’ you might say.

As she aged and all around her settled down – she steadfastly resisted.

Many whisperers did appear from ‘various gossipers’,

They said ‘she couldn’t love’, and of course much worse.

This was not the case that she ‘could not love’- the truth was that she actually loved too hard.

(Well once in a blue moon that is when the right biological, time-a-logical, socio-intellectual bloke arrived.)

Unfortunately, on ‘matters of the heart’ – she had a curse.

And when she did feel love or closeness, the electronics in her body went haywire.

(Her nervous system would pull rank on her)

Those pangs of anxiety simply wouldn’t let her settle down with one guy, once and for all.

Tragically the more she felt loving feelings the further she was made to run.

(Perversely this meant she could only essentially marry the ‘amorphous male blobosphere’).

So she kicked to the kerb many guys she really liked, and a couple or at least one of these she loved.

Not becasue she wanted to.

She had to.

(Her internal physiological Sergeant Major had pulled rank).

The electronics inside were stronger than diamond chains around her feet,

And it would take a series of perfectly planned and executed wars to break those chains,

To then allow the feelings of closeness not to trigger electrical short circuits within.

(I hope that day comes)

And so her career rolled on, money was made, rent was paid.

But as the years rolled,

Her social life was increasingly a ever slightly degrading repeat and rehash of her youth in England/Europe.

(You see with addiction, the hit gets less high each time).

Perhaps now described best as quasi-controlled-debauteurous weekends,

Mixed with typical middle class dinner parties, drunk racing events, cafe coffees and brunches.

As the grey hairs grew she new she was having the same year, done many times over.

(The Sergeant Major was not yet in retirement and was still ‘blasting ears’)

She knew she wasn’t happy (I know as she even let slip one day – but weren’t we city-o-office-o’s all that way?).

At heart she always wanted to be an entrepreneur – set her own hours – do her own thing.

But she got trapped as a salary-woman in a mega city does.

(After all – is not the invention of the ‘big city’ the oldest trap on humankind there is?)

Late in life she tried to become an entrepreneur –

I’m not sure if that worked.

After all, entrepreneurs are entrepreneurs while young.

They find a way – becasue it is who they are.

I guess I was lucky that she couldn’t handle long term closeness,

Becasue we would have never met at that drunken bar when she was pushing forty.

(When we kissed, didn’t come home with me and then handed me her business card pre taxi home)

Of course I may be deluding myself.

I could easily say using joes-schmo logic ‘that was a ruinous night and the start of a war’.

But now old I know that sometimes you meet who you need to meet at the time.

(And it will disrupt and shift your entire life).

And it might be someone who allows the needed dismantling of your entire life to occur.

That would not have happened otherwise.

And I guess that’s why I met her.

(I had a not just a destiny-date with a mirror – but a date to be thrown through it to a parallel-life)

But with the peace-and-fun-becoming-full-blown-war (that was us) being now long over,

With the mustard gas that was stinging my (our?) eyes long gone –

I (we?) can now see that clearly.

And isn’t it interesting that there is one part inside myself that has never changed.

Perhaps that is a all-knowing holographic part of her inside my chest.

I don’t know if that’s a healthy assessment – but I don’t really care.

It is simply an immovable object inside.

It is what Olympus Mons is to the surface of Mars.

But the question is (and has been over the rolling years) what to do about it?

Does the famous climbers Q & A adage hold for me? –

“Why did you climb that mountain? – becasue it’s there”.

And so I sometimes look at Olypus Mons, from far away Earth.

And I wonder if I too would/should Travel there.

To see her in true strikingly perfectly imperfect unique beauty.

After all – I believe that today she is still ‘There’.

Yet currently at star-date 2026.4958 I am still ‘Here’.

Perhaps I am like an asteroid that collided on Olympus Mons with a ‘glancing blow’,

And so natural physical law demanded I skip away into the black skies never to return.

Yet information cannot ever be scrubbed.

Yet the scars of the collision remain within the asteroid’s hulk, within me,

As so do more than a few small fragments of her (my ‘Olympus Mons’).

So I guess if I never see her rugged striking heights and cosmically unique grandeur again,

I can always say she never one hundred percent left anyway.

I carry literally a few pieces of her with me through space and time.

And will her short-circuiting electronics (her Sgt. Major Syndrome) ever be fixed before she is gone?

Perhaps when it is, this will be the spark that starts the spaceship’s thrusters,

And while I am thinking I will simply be whisked away to see her.

Physics itself will be in ‘dictatorial charge’ of the matter.

(it will issue an edict that will happen).

Yes – let’s end it there and agree to that seemingly quasi-copout shall we?

(Why do the most frank assessments also seem so glib and weak sounding or is it just me?).

It is time to wrap it up.

After all this prose poem has become an odyssey in its own right,

(Or is it the modern-version unsent letter?).

And perhaps with a mind of its own, and definitely a nervous system.

So there is now only one more line that I have to say,

And whatever the future holds it will remain true for everlasting eternity.

And that last line is this:

She was she, I was me, and we both still are…..

(And at least if nothing else – I still have that).

BONUS MATERIAL: WHAT DOES THE WORDPRESS AI BOT THINK OF THIS WRITING?

Special Post: Bananas Bananas….Jungian Synchronicity …And My Physics Thesis called ‘Synchronicity -Entanglement-Oneness’ (A Thought/Blog Post)

If I ever go into the Supermarket & a staff member from ‘fresh-produce’ comes over to me randomly & says “Yes we have no bananas” ….I will take that as 100% proof we are living in a simulation. Either that or it’s just Jungian synchronicity – for I just wrote some prose mentioning bananas. It’s one or t’other brother!.

On that matter, while I was in Dunedin NZ a few weeks ago I spent some time in the 2nd hand bookstores (‘Hard To Find Books’ in Dowling St), I read the first 30 odd pages of Jungs Synchronicity. It was very interesting & he posited (well this is my take on what he posited) that there is a ‘a-causal field’ psychic related probably to the consciousness/sub-consciousness that emanates outwards & perhaps everywhere in what physicists like to call ‘non local fashion’. I think there is truth to this, as I have experienced this synchronicity myself.

Now Jung did say that co-incidence can be confused with Synchronicity, & you need to be careful. Real Synchronicity is of the kind he mentioned with his “Scarab beetle” example while he mentioned in the book. He had a customer on the couch who was talking of her dream, which involved a Scarab beetle (or some rare Beetle at least). Immediately upon saying this, a Beetle of that exact description flew in the window & landed on Jungs hand – he presented it to her & said “was it like this”. The Beetle in question was not known to be in the area & the season for Beetles was all wrong etc etc – so the chance coincidence was the cause was of such infinitesimal unlikeliness, that Jung believed that the psychic/creative force that he called ‘Synchronicity’ was the reason.

I myself had something similar happen. A couple of weeks ago I went to my usual day job which was doing soem gardening for an older man. unrelated to this around the same time I went on a saturday drive to a town nearby, where I went to a Salvation Army store & bought a secondhand book, a autobioraphy by Hulk Hogan . In the book he talked of going back to his old childhood house, digging in the back yard & findign one of his old ‘dinky’ car toys (in NZ we use the term ‘Dinky’ for the little toy cars kids have). Ok back to my garden job. When I went to my garden job, I had not yet got to the page where Hulk Hogan tells of digging up the little car toy from his childhood. While I was on the Garden job, I myself dug up an old ‘dinky’ car toy. Two days later I got to the part in the book where Hulk Hogan talks about digging up the car toy.

I believe this personal experience was indeed Synchronicity. Coincidence can be discounted, as the chances of me buying a book where someone talks of digging up a toy car, in the same few days where I do the same thing are infinitesimal. It was Synchronicity. I’ve had a few things like that happen. Jungian Synchronicity is real.

I bet you have experienced it to.

This kind of thing is amazing phenomena. Modern science is perhaps not so denouncing of ‘psychic fields’ as it used to be, but I would say only slightly so. Modern science still feels embarrassed about this kind of stuff – even though the Truth of quantum physics, (with all its non local effects & instantaneous fields & entanglements etc) which has been totally accepted, proved & used in our various electrical technologies. Science & Physics shame on you! Be more courageous! It ( that is a-causal Synchronicities like Jung described) is not weirdo stuff!

I have my own ideas about it all. Let me tell you my idea. Physics has its big bang theory. At the start of the big bang, everything that would constitute the later universe of today was all melded in together in something the size of a grapefruit, or perhaps even only a golf ball. Entropy theory tells us that this grapefruit (or golf ball) was almost perfectly ‘ordered’, & then it slowly became less ordered & more chaotic, differentiated – the less order allowed what we have in our daily universe – protons electrons gravity, electromagnetic waves etc etc. My theory is that at the start the universe was basically one amorphous thing, there was no real differentation (other than what was required by the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle – which incidentily was the seed for the Universe to evolve). So atthis early stage, the Universe acted as one thing – you might call it a “pre-entangled singular state” – (but this is probably neccesarily an imperfect description).

My theory is that the universe could not ever possibly lose this oneness – dispite the appearences of our universe as it is (lots of seemingly different things, obeying different applicable laws of physics – Gravitation, Electrostatics, Nuclear etc etc). Synchronicity must happen, as the universe still has lingering effects of the totalised oneness at the beginning of the Universe. Physicist believe that the information content in the Universe cannot ever be lost – so this would marry up with the idea that Syncronicity is the (very real) informational echoe of that information about the oneness of the Universe that can’t be destroyed.

P.s. I should also state that Synchronicity is also an effect of the eternal oneness of the Universe in the way that we see everything in the universe being entangled with everthing else (Entanglement has been proved by Physics in terms of particles, & perhaps also very basic atoms but not for much larger objects like a Human) . I believe that Entanglement does apply to everything big & small in the Universe – particles, quarks, photons, bosons, Cats, Planets, Black Holes, Rocks, People, Clouds etc).

Synchronicity -Entanglement-Oneness these are all seemingly different phenomena of essentially the same thing.

Anyway that’s my theory – I hope you enjoyed it, & maybe you have an idea or twon on it all.

Now Goodnight from a very cold, very wintery, but beautifully starry night in Central Otago New Zealand

Martin A. Smith 14 Jun 2025

“Leaves falling in a bored mans head” ( Prose/A Thought)

By Martin Anton Smith martinantonsmith@gmail.com

Right now it is Autumn – or as the yanks say – “fall”.

The other day I looked at a giant pile of wind curated leaves on my front yard.

The thought appeared –

Each leaf has come from a particular tree, from a particular branch, & from a certain sub-branch,

But as I look at the big seemingly homogenous leaf pile – that information is not available to me personally.

The Physics man tells us in that theory you could somehow still “ID” any one of those leaves.

For the total information content of the universe is always preserved.

I thought that it’s pretty cool that there are trillions of seemingly indistinguishable leaves out there but the universe still knows exactly where they came from.

I also was kinda miffed that I’d never be able to find that info – or so I thought.

A couple of days later, most the leaves had fallen – so there were only a couple of hundred of leaves on each tree.

I watched one of them waggle on the tree, & I could even watch it waggle off from its precise location.

That meant when that leaf hit the big pile of its friends below,

I could know exactly where it used to live – which tree which branch which sub-branch it fell from.

A lot of artists say that science ruins the ‘magic’ of the world – I disagree –

I think both of these ‘where did the leaf live’ situations were interesting in their own right.

The real problem these artists who say science ruins ‘the magic of the world’ is they don’t know any science at all.

If they knew just a little about it, they’d see some of the magic in science too.

But I won’t labour the point –

I mean it’s not my place to once again throw the second law of infodynamics into another artists face.

I’ve been doing that far too much lately & I really must cut down on it.

And in closing If you ask someone be they a leaf, an artist, or a man of science

They will all agree that…

….I’ve got to fucking get out more….

But then again….

Is there really anything wrong with leaves falling in a bored man’s head?...

“The Bomb-Cleaner” (A Poem)

by Martin Anton Smith

My room is a messy cluttered disaster zone @ this is its homeostasis.

Being neat & tidy does not come natural to me – a main house I can be tidy –

But a personal bedroom has always been my disaster zone.

I’ve been thinking of the best way to quickly tidy up –

It is to explode a bomb in the middle of the room –

Entropically speaking this would have to work wonders.

For my room is always at maximum entropy.

I like to think of it as a model of the end state of our universe –

So disordered it can’t become any more disordered.

Physicists call this the ‘heat death of the universe’,

And contend that nothing at all can happen –

It would be like a giant timeless frozen hologram.

My ‘bomb cleans my room’ thought has made me think of an alternate Physics theory.

Or should I say a conjecture which is really just a ‘tentative theory’,

A proto theory if you will.

You see I propose that instead of frozen nothingness,

Something can happen.

But it can only move in the direction of decreasing entropy or increasing order.

i.e. I let a bomb off & it takes my dirty undies off the floor & they fly into a draw, nicely folded, clean.

The CD’s unscatter & leap back into the bookshelf.

The dust disappears & reattaches itself to my arms & as fibres on my coats.

What’s that you say egghead?

“Entropy must always increase”

Well, not if Physics laws are nestled in a hierarchy.

So for my “Bomb cleans up room theory” to work, this would be so.

The higher Physics law enabling this would be:

“You cannot have a universe where nothing happens”.

So instead of the Universe & my room Freezing – it has to do something.

It can’t get any more messy – it’s in a state of maximum disorder & entropy.

So the only thing it can do is clean itself up.

Which is why my dirty undies cleaned & re-drawered themselves.

This of course would entail us living our lives backward –

dead people would come out of graves, back to hospital & then start breathing,

grow younger & younger until you die by returning to you mother’s womb.

Perhaps this is what is already happening now.

“But that’s not how we remember things” I hear you cry!

“we remember being a child before being a teenager & an adult” I hear you utter.

This would merely entail we remember futures first & not our pasts first!

The Film of the universe is always running backwards, & our brains merely fixo chango it –

So everything looks normal.

Yes Yes Yes I hear the squirrely voices of you naysayers!

This conjecture is undoubtably true…

I say this without an ounce of overconfidence!

Now I really must leave this Royal Society lecture hall.

A spot of Bomb-Cleaning is in order.

For my room has reached Maximum Entropy & Chaos!

P.S. My other theory is I have gone totally doo-lally,

Which as a fiction writer, is actually a plus.

As I always never say:

Being backward is the only real way forward.

………..

Boom.

“The Fabricator Vs The Engineer Vs The Physicist” (A Poem – Features in Ep. 43 of Podcast)

Listen here:

The most common form of “Stolen Valour” is not someone posing as an Ex-Army Vet,

No Sir, that prize belongs to the ‘Fabricator’ that pretends to be an ‘Engineer’.

But should we really be surprised when a “Fabricator” is also a “Liar”?

I mean semantically the two words mean the same thing.

Words have Power.

Maybe this is why Fabricators love to call themselves “Engineers”.

But consider the brute facts:

Engineers don’t weld Trailor’s – Fabricators do.

Engineers can do higher math – Fabricators can’t.

Engineers have letters after their names – Fabricators dropped out of high school.

Engineers can ‘eat time’ – Fabricators are impatient.

Engineers live on the hill – Fabricators are willing to die on it.

But it would be a mistake to be snobby about Fabricators –

Society needs them – as weirdly we still need Well Welded Trailers just as much as we do Bridges, Cars, Computers & Aeroplanes.

A fabricator is an “essential worker”.

And a Fabricator can ‘Smell a Rat’ better than anyone – in true working-class fashion.

And there are more “Rats” out there than ever these days.

And let’s not forget the stereotype of the “arrogant engineer” – for there is an ounce truth in every stereotype.

However, Another Godlier Profession Trumps Both the Engineer & the Fabricator:

Those Awesome Physicists – The ‘Rockstars’ of Science’.

Yes, Physicists ‘lie’ – but these are “white lies” and used only to simplify their equations,

& so you – a total boob – can understand them.

There was a story about a Physicist caught ‘lying’ once,

But this was just hearsay as heard by a disgruntled Fabricator,

While eavesdropping on an Engineer, who sneakily called himself a Physicist.

What’s that you say?

About Physicist Richard Feynman?

About his supposed immorality?

Yes, he lied but only about his naughty deeds with his colleague’s wives – never about Physics.

Thus, the status of the worlds Physicists remains where it should be,

right next to the ‘God Particle’.

But then again, a Physicist often doesn’t wash for days & weeks while working on a tough equation.

And I ask you – should we all be forced to wear pegs on our noses for the sake of scientific progress?

So, I as judge, must call it a three-way tie between all the bastards.

The Fabricator, The Engineer, & the Physicist are all equally Good & Bad.

P.S. A near sighted fool might have said this to compare & contrast the three:

One probably has boils, one boils his kettle a lot, & the other lectures on “Boyles law”.

by Martin Anton Smith follow me on twitter/fb/Instagram: @mrschmitzo